No subject
Fri Sep 2 03:59:05 CDT 2011
open-ended), it might be possible to simply run "install_amp" with little or
no modification. Upgrades shouldn't be too much of an issue either.
Of course this less ideal that a true port, but given the realities of
FreePBX and the ports system difficulties perhaps it's more viable. Just a
suggestion.
--
Adam Vande More
--00151750e42ad79b2804afb26558
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Roger Marquis <=
span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:marquis at roble.com">marquis at roble.com=
</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin=
:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
This is a good solution for those who don't mind binary distributions<b=
r>
using defaults chosen by the package developers (whether deb or rpm).<br>
Unfortunately, this means a lot of unnecessary dependencies, a lot of<br>
unused code, and reduced security and performance.<br>
<br>
Obviously not an issue for those who use Linux distributions by default,<br=
>
they do offer many other advantages over FreeBSD. =A0But for those who use<=
br>
FreeBSD for it's maintainability a Linux jail or jail image is not the<=
br>
preferred solution.<br></blockquote></div><br>I'd like to address a cou=
ple things.=A0 First, I completely disagree that this approach would result=
in decreased security.=A0 I believe the opposite is true.=A0 Second, the s=
peed impact would be negligible for all but the most intense environments w=
ith the possible exception of network latency/throughput(A jail would still=
be better at this than a full VM).=A0 There's nothing saying this coul=
dn't be a VIMAGE enabled jail which should largely alleviate that poten=
tial issue as well.=A0 Using Linux compatibility might also result in even =
faster application:=A0 <a href=3D"http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Da=
rticle&item=3Dlinux_games_bsd&num=3D1">http://www.phoronix.com/scan=
.php?page=3Darticle&item=3Dlinux_games_bsd&num=3D1</a> -- perhaps t=
he only time I'll ever cite a Phoronix article.<br>
<br>What I didn't articulate well or at all is this jail wouldn't n=
eed to utilize Linux compatibility layer, just an Linux-like filesystem hie=
rarchy.=A0 With some mods to PORT vars in the jail you'd have a complet=
ely source based native install of all the prerequisites in paths FreePBX i=
s designed for.=A0 From there(and this is a real weakness in my suggest bec=
ause it's open-ended), it might be possible to simply run "install=
_amp" with little or no modification.=A0 Upgrades shouldn't be too=
much of an issue either.<br>
<br>Of course this less ideal that a true port, but given the realities of =
FreePBX and the ports system difficulties perhaps it's more viable.=A0 =
Just a suggestion.<br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br>Adam Vande More<br>
--00151750e42ad79b2804afb26558--
More information about the Asterisk-BSD
mailing list