No subject
Sun Jul 19 19:54:31 CDT 2009
Max
--000e0cd4894e1258f70473ae0fee
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello!<div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:59 PM, =
Hans Petter Selasky <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto:hselasky at c2i.ne=
t">hselasky at c2i.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div>=A0</div><blockquote clas=
s=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;pad=
ding-left:1ex;">
<div><div class=3D"h5">> > The HFC-4S/8S cards are already supported =
by ISDN4BSD (FreeBSD 7,8,9).<br>
> ><br>
> > <a href=3D"http://www.selasky.org/hans_petter/isdn4bsd" target=3D=
"_blank">http://www.selasky.org/hans_petter/isdn4bsd</a><br>
><br>
> They are, but ISDN4BSD requires non-stock chan_capi.<br>
<br>
</div></div>And what is the problem about that? The stock chan_capi used to=
have some<br>
important features missing like dynamic config reload, and is not BSD<br>
licensed!</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I acidentally replied in private.=
Re-sending to mailing list:</div><div><br></div><div><span class=3D"Apple-=
style-span" style=3D"font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; borde=
r-collapse: collapse; ">I am mostly concerned not about features (or licens=
e), but about maintainability.<br>
More information about the Asterisk-BSD
mailing list