[Asterisk-bsd] 1.2-rc2 can't find -lodbc on FreeBSD

[Graham Menhennitt]

Dr. Rich Murphey wrote:
> There's a bug in the cdr/Makefile and res/Makefile.
> It appears to be finding the header files for the odbc library, but 
> isn't setting the path for locating the library itself.
>
> I'll submit the following patch to fix it.
>
> Cheers,
> Rich
>
>
> Index: cdr/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /usr/cvsroot/asterisk/cdr/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.33
> diff -u -r1.33 Makefile
> --- cdr/Makefile    1 Nov 2005 21:53:29 -0000    1.33
> +++ cdr/Makefile    12 Nov 2005 22:43:05 -0000
> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@
> endif
>
> ifeq ($(findstring BSD,${OSARCH}),BSD)
> -  CFLAGS+=-I$(CROSS_COMPILE_TARGET)/usr/local/include 
> -L$(CROSS_COMPILE_TARGET)/usr/local/lib
> +  CFLAGS+=-I$(CROSS_COMPILE_TARGET)/usr/local/include
> +  SOLINK+=-L$(CROSS_COMPILE_TARGET)/usr/local/lib
> endif
>
> #The problem with sparc is the best stuff is in newer versions of gcc 
> (post 3.0) only.
> Index: res/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /usr/cvsroot/asterisk/res/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.29
> diff -u -r1.29 Makefile
> --- res/Makefile    8 Nov 2005 00:12:21 -0000    1.29
> +++ res/Makefile    12 Nov 2005 22:43:06 -0000
> @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@
> endif
>
> ifeq ($(findstring BSD,${OSARCH}),BSD)
> -  CFLAGS+=-I$(CROSS_COMPILE_TARGET)/usr/local/include 
> -L$(CROSS_COMPILE_TARGET)/usr/local/lib
> +  CFLAGS+=-I$(CROSS_COMPILE_TARGET)/usr/local/include
> +  SOLINK+=-L$(CROSS_COMPILE_TARGET)/usr/local/lib
> endif
>
> ifeq (${OSARCH},CYGWIN)
>
>
>
> Graham Menhennitt wrote:
>> I just tried building asterisk-1.2rc2 and got the same compilation 
>> error twice in two sub-directories:
>>
>> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lodbc
>>
>> Removing -lodbc from the two Makefiles (res and cdr sub-dirs) allows 
>> the build to complete. Is this expected? Should I report it as a 
>> Asterisk on FreeBSD bug? Perhaps it's a missing dependency - if so, 
>> what should I be installing?
>>
Thanks Rich. That fixed it.

Graham