<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<tt>To paraphrase Marcellus from Hamlet -- </tt><tt> --- it seems that
something is rotten in the state of Digium....<br>
Is the ship out of control??<br>
</tt><br>
Garrett Smith wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:D1B5C2B15252464B9A70599C4FD1EE7B010B36A4@b2ex01.b2llc.local"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Kevin:
We got ads booted for having Asterisk in the copy.
What I find the most humorous about this that if you resell Digium PCI cards, like VoIP Supply does and you advertise that Digium PCI card on Google via Adwords, you can't put "works with Asterisk" in the ad copy for that product as the Google filters will boot the ad.
Maybe Digium want us resellers to substitute "Asterisk" with "trixbox" or one of the other open source telephony platforms.
I have no problems with companies protecting their trademarks, but when you have been selling millions of dollars per year of a companies products for over three years, you would figure that company would at least be proactive and tell you that they are going to be doing this (or add you to the safe list).
The first time you hear of the policy change shouldn't be when Google's send you an email stating that ads had been denied...and I am still waiting on the "authorization" I asked for on Monday.
Garrett Smith
716-250-3408 OFFICE
716-630-1548 FAX
716-903-9495 MOBILE
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gsmith@voipsupply.com">gsmith@voipsupply.com</a>
Meet me on Facebook or LinkedIn
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any document attached hereto is intended only for the named recipient(s). It is the property of the VoIP Supply, LLC and shall not be used, disclosed or reproduced without the express written consent of VoIP Supply, LLC. If you are not the intended recipient, nor the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message in confidence to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify me immediately by reply e-mail or telephone and then delete this message, including any attachments. Our mailing address is 454 Sonwil Drive, Buffalo, NY 14225 USA.
-----Original Message-----
From: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com">asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com</a> [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com">mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>] On Behalf Of Kevin P. Fleming
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 6:44 PM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium enforcing its trademarks
Brian West wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">You shouldn't have to contact Digium for such use cases as "Asterisk
Compatible" or "Works with Asterisk".
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
The issue is *not* the use of the trademarks within the ad copy itself
(as you rightly point out), it is the purchase of search
results/listings for those trademarks via the AdWords process. As far as
I'm aware, it's perfectly acceptable to have an ad that says "Our
products are compatible with Asterisk" or "Our products are based on
Asterisk" or similar copy, but purchasing 'Asterisk' or 'Digium' as a
keyword to get those ads to show up in searches is not allowed unless
Digium has authorized you to do so.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>