Maybe they are. Private companies are not obligated to make such things public......<br><br>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/3/08, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jay R. Ashworth</b> <<a href="mailto:jra@baylink.com">jra@baylink.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 01:08:41PM -0500, Matthew Rubenstein wrote:<br>> Digium's *trademark* on the "Asterisk" brand name, and its existing
<br><br>And so, because I *like* rousing rabble (:-), why isn't Digium suing<br>Bright House Cable (who are in the telephone business these days) for<br>their Asterisk Hunter campaign?<br><br>Cheers,<br>-- jra<br>--<br>
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink <a href="mailto:jra@baylink.com">jra@baylink.com</a><br>Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100<br>Ashworth & Associates
<a href="http://baylink.pitas.com">http://baylink.pitas.com</a> '87 e24<br>St Petersburg FL USA <a href="http://photo.imageinc.us">http://photo.imageinc.us</a> +1 727 647 1274<br><br>
Witty slogan redacted until AMPTP stop screwing WGA<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com--">http://www.api-digital.com--
</a><br><br>asterisk-biz mailing list<br>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br> <a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz</a><br></blockquote>
</div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Bob Murphy<br>Principal<br><br><br>Arreva Communications<br><a href="http://www.arrevausa.com">www.arrevausa.com</a><br><br>949-334-2022-SIP Connect<br>949-842-8450-Wireless<br>949-349-0209-Fax