<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/17/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Zoa</b> <<a href="mailto:zoachien@securax.org">zoachien@securax.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>I would like to comment on my own post, unlike signate before in 2006 ,<br>according to their pdf they did do their homework and used a setting new<br>to sipp: :make pcapplay"instead of the echo mode. which should fix that,
<br>and reinvite is set to no, so i cannot find any flaws in the test setup,<br>however i would still like to see pps measurements, i still can't<br>believe linux can handle that amount of packets per second in userlevel
<br>on that type of hardware. (based on my own measurements from years ago<br>on a dual xeon - not dual core)</blockquote><div><br><br>the 5140 is a woodcrest, while its a xeon its slightly different from other xeons. It can do that level (even the
2.0Ghz one has done more than that, which is what I got over a year ago now). If you look, as I pointed out in a different email, the bandwidth used on the asterisk server section (page 48-50) is at most 16MB or 128Mbps, if you were to divide that down to packets you would see something about like 80k pps or one roughly every 750 usec (T1 does 1 every 125usec). Unless I did something wrong in my math, I think its doable.
<br></div><br></div><br>-- <br>Trixter <a href="http://www.0xdecafbad.com">http://www.0xdecafbad.com</a> Bret McDanel<br>Belfast +44 28 9099 6461 US +1 516 687 5200<br><a href="http://www.trxtel.com">http://www.trxtel.com
</a> the phone company that pays you!