<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/9/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Alistair Cunningham</b> <<a href="mailto:acunningham@integrics.com">acunningham@integrics.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:<br>> I am still wondering about the original 60,000 user claim, that can be<br>> revealed but the user base doesnt allow for concurrent calls per box to<br>> be revealed?<br><br>Trixter,
<br><br>That's correct. We've been asked by some prospective customers how many<br>users our largest existing customers have, so we found out and got<br>permission from the customers concerned to share this information. We
<br>never asked if we could share the concurrent call information, so I<br>won't. I think that's the ethical thing to do.</blockquote><div><br>I still hold by the rest of what I said which is that there is a big difference between a "grandma" user (one who makes or receives very few calls) and a call center or telemarketing company who is doing tons of concurrent calls, which makes the 60,000 user number basically worthless without concurrent call numbers.
<br><br>As such, since you asked before for marketing purposes to get a total user count, could you get a total call count (perhaps with ALOC info, how many systems that was spread across, is the concurrent call counter a sustained number or peak, what is the average, etc). Numbers that equate to something more tangable than users that may or may not be placing calls through the system.
<br><br></div><br></div><br>-- <br>Trixter <a href="http://www.0xdecafbad.com">http://www.0xdecafbad.com</a> Bret McDanel<br>Belfast +44 28 9099 6461 US +1 516 687 5200<br><a href="http://www.trxtel.com">http://www.trxtel.com
</a> the VoIP provider that pays you!