No subject

The TCE400B decompresses G.729a (8.0kbit) or G.723.1 (5.3kbit/6.0kbit) into=
 G.711 u-law or a-law; or compresses G.711 u-law or a-law into G.729a (8.0k=
bit) or G.723.1 (5.3kbit). The TCE400B is rated to handle up to 120 bi-dire=
ctional G.729a transformations or 92 bi-directional G.723.1 transformations=
. The TCE400B does not require additional licensing fees for the use of the=
se codecs nor does it require the registration process association with Dig=
ium's software-based G.729a codec licensing. 

----------------------------------------
 From: "Mike" <list at net-wall.com>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:23 AM
To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion" <asterisk-biz at li=
sts.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card

  Is there a config I need to put in to get to 120? Or does the firmware co=
ntrol that, and I got sold an old card by my distributor last week?   Mike =
      From: asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz-boun=
ces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Bryant Zimmerman
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:19 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card   Mike

On G729 they do 120 with their current firmware.

Bryant   
----------------------------------------
  From: "Mike" <list at net-wall.com>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 10:16 AM
To: "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion" <asterisk-biz at li=
sts.digium.com>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card Sorry to so=
rt of hijack this thread, but isn't Digium transcoding only able to get up =
to 92 sessions, not 120?   Or did I buy the wrong card?   Mike     From: as=
terisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digi=
um.com] On Behalf Of Ben Klang
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 9:31 AM
To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Digium vs. Sangoma Transcoding card       On Oc=
t 29, 2010, at 9:21 AM, asterisk at dovid.net wrote:     Hi,

Does anyone have experience with Digium vs. Sangoma transcoding cards  
? From experience Sangoma has been a lot harder to integrate with  
Asterisk. Wondering what the plus side may be to using Sangoma over  
Digium.       Unfortunately the Sangoma transcoder integration with Asteris=
k is still significantly harder to integrate than the Digium product.  The =
Sangoma card has a loopback network interface and audio is streamed to it v=
ia RTP, meaning that you have to have a private, local subnet for each Sang=
oma transcoder card.  However, the big advantage is that Sangoma can get up=
 to 480 sessions in a single card (D100-480) vs. the ~120 that you get with=
 Digium.  If you are needing large concurrencies then Sangoma has a strong =
advantage.       /BAK/        --    Ben Klang   Chief Visionary   Verendus =
  404.475.4841   bklang at verendus.com       Insightful Technology Solutions =
     Regards,

Dovid

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-biz mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz        


------=_NextPart_000_0001_6F3450FC.22096744
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<span style=3D"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt">=
Mike<br />
<br />
It is the firmware driver that activates this. It is only for the g729 thou=
gh as far as I know. I do not the g723 so I am not sure on this.<br />
<br />