[asterisk-biz] Free DIDs

[Alex Balashov]

Also, T-Mobile (in the US) and Boost have fewer users, more capacity 
glut and larger returns to scale.

So, the folks who explicitly offer unlimited are, more often than not, 
the ones who can afford to because of how the subscriber density and 
contention ratios work out.

Alex Balashov wrote:

> Easier said than done.
> 
> I don't think anyone is going to argue with you from an ideological 
> pespective, least of all I.
> 
> But it's a harder problem than it looks on the surface.
> 
> Trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 04:27 -0400, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>> What I'm trying to say is that customers accustomed to flat-rate 
>>> access would run screaming from any ISP that insinuates or intimates 
>>> in the slightest that their service is in any way "limited" from a 
>>> metered perspective.  It's no different in voice, except that 
>>> synchronous TDM channels aren't as oversubscribable as packets.
>>>
>>
>> Boost mobile, T-mobile and probably a few others do let you do
>> unlimited.  As in 24/7 with as many 3-way (Tmobile lets some users do
>> 6-way) calls as you want within the confines of the plan (for example my
>> fav, or whatever).
>>
>> So companies that are unable to offer that just say they do and put a
>> disclaimer somewhere in fine print saying they dont so that the
>> marketing sides look equal even though they really arent.
>>
>> some people would call that lying others would suggest that its false
>> advertising.  I personally have used the term shady to describe what you
>> are saying and said that the law should be changed to make it false
>> advertising because in reality its trickery to get people to give you
>> money for a service you have no intention on offering.
> 
> 


-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems
Web    : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel    : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (678) 237-1775