[asterisk-biz] ANI
Jay R. Ashworth
jra at baylink.com
Fri May 9 12:12:59 CDT 2008
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 12:59:42PM -0400, Steve Totaro wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Jay R. Ashworth <jra at baylink.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 08:18:02AM -0700, Miles Scruggs wrote:
> >> This belief is limited to your experience with PRIs. When you obtain
> >> SIP termination services from ATT, Verizon, or Level 3. They have no
> >> way of verifying what ANI/CID you are sending.
> >
> > You don't *send* an ANI.
> >
> > Your carrier does.
> >
> > I'm pretty sure the FCC puts their foot down on this point, though I
> > can't cite chapter and verse.
>
> I found this nugget that seems to verify that ANI spoofing is
> possible, especially using VoIP. My setup is a LD T1 PRI, The test
> was done via VoIP as it was successful. Actually the test call was
> done via all VoIP which explains it. I am a TDM on the outside and
> VoIP on the inside so I was wrong and outside of my realm.
>
> http://www.asteriskvoipnews.com/asterisk_news/cidani_spoofing_on_voip_using_asterisk.html
>
> "What is Automated ANI / Caller ID spoofing?
> Automated ANI / Caller ID spoofing is setting the number you are
> calling from without the use of an operator / company PBX system. By
> far the easiest method thanks to the increasing take-up of internet
> telephony services are VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) service
> providers who allow you when using their service to set whatever
> caller ID you like (which is also used as ANI)."
Could you post the portions of the dump which cause you to believe ANI
was spoofed? See my other reply on this...
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth Baylink jra at baylink.com
Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com '87 e24
St Petersburg FL USA http://photo.imageinc.us +1 727 647 1274
Those who cast the vote decide nothing.
Those who count the vote decide everything.
-- (Joseph Stalin)
More information about the asterisk-biz
mailing list