[asterisk-biz] XO SIP Service ?

[Jared Geiger]

I wouldn't recommend their SIP service for two main reasons:

1) Billing problems every single bill
2) Only supported inband DTMF (may now support rfc2833)

The quality was decent as they were ulaw when I used them. However they
can't seem to deliver CNAM from everywhere on their origination product
which is odd. Random DIDs would include CNAM and others would not.

Granted things might have changed as they are moving to new Sonus gateways.

Bottom line, decent quality voice if you don't need all the extra bells and
whistles and can tolerate tons of billing mistakes.

On Feb 7, 2008 9:00 PM, <jcapp at anteil.com> wrote:

> We used XO SIP with * for just short of a year.  It worked well and was
> very reliable.  Contact me off list if you'd like more details.
>
> Jim
>
> > Dear List:
> >
> > Can anyone vouch for the interoperability of XO's SIP service  and * ?
> >
> > E.g., how long have you been using it,  voice quality, price
> > competitiveness, shortcomings,  Asterisk configuration?
> >
> > Thanks a bunch!
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
> >
> > asterisk-biz mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--
>
> asterisk-biz mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20080208/bf751bce/attachment-0001.htm