[asterisk-biz] Recent REMOTE CRASH BUG

Ming Yong voiceroutelist at gmail.com
Sat Mar 3 14:20:15 MST 2007


Guys,
I believe everybody agrees that Asterisk v1.4 is by no means production 
ready. I believe almost everyone who runs production level systems are 
still at v1.2.15, which is great by the way. Kevin has a point in that 
for the amount of features added in Asterisk v1.4. The team at Digium 
has done a good job in general however, I have to agree with Matt that 
given the immense financial returns digium has gotten from the Asterisk 
project. There is definitely room for improvement on the "open-ness" and 
stability of asterisk.

Ming
> Matt wrote:
>   
>> However, we will not be purchasing any more Digium cards until Digium
>> realizes that PCI is an extremely old standard.  As it stands right now,
>> and someone may correct me if I'm wrong, all Digium cards are PCI-X, and
>> hence have issues with sharing IRQs.    Unfortunately, as you will see
>> if you do a search on the mailing list, most new motherboards insist on
>> sharing IRQs with things... this causes audio issues.   
>>     
>
> If you believe PCI (or PCI-X) has anything at all to do with interrupt
> sharing issues, you are mistaken. If you believe that PCI Express has
> anything to do with solving interrupt sharing issues, again you are
> mistaken.
>
> PCI, PCI-X and PCI Express all support the same interrupt handling
> methodologies; PCI Express just provides a different signaling
> mechanism. It is up to the system's chipset designers to decide how
> those interrupts are going to be handled (XT-PIC, APIC, etc.). It would
> certainly be possible for there to be a PCI Express system that did not
> use an APIC for IRQ routing, but you'll never see one because PCI
> Express systems are brand-new and all brand-new chipsets have APICs.
>
>   
>> Until Digium gets with 2007, we will be purchasing Sangoma PCI-express
>> cards.   I hate to do it, because like I said I want to support Digium,
>> but their hardware is not staying with the times.
>>     
>
> I won't disagree that our lack of PCI Express support is something we'd
> like to solve, but IRQ sharing issues will not be solved by just
> switching to PCI Express (which in most cases involves nothing more than
> sticking a PCI Express -to- PCI-X bridge chip on the board). We have
> already made some significant driver improvements in the last couple of
> months in this area, and our customers (and support department) are now
> reporting that in nearly every case of a suspected 'IRQ sharing' problem
> updating to the latest Zaptel 1.2/1.4 release cures the problem (note
> that I am not in support nor do I deal with these issues directly... I
> am only reporting what I have been told).
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-biz mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>
>   


-- 
Ming Yong
Business Development
Voiceroute LLC
Voice: Dial 650.331.1732 ext 301
Call VOIP => sip:301 at pbx.voiceroute.net
ming at voiceroute.net





More information about the asterisk-biz mailing list