[asterisk-biz] Re: asterisk-biz Digest, Vol 30, Issue 61

[akorah at exemem.com]

hello

Which is the best, scalable and in terms of number of concurrent calls, 
Asterisk or YATE?

Abe

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <asterisk-biz-request at lists.digium.com>
To: <asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 2:00 PM
Subject: asterisk-biz Digest, Vol 30, Issue 61


> Send asterisk-biz mailing list submissions to
> asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> asterisk-biz-request at lists.digium.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> asterisk-biz-owner at lists.digium.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of asterisk-biz digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: OT:Any guy from Teliax here? (Mike Benoit)
>   2. UK and Australia  unlimited calling channels needed (adi)
>   3. Re: UK and Australia unlimited calling channels needed
>      (Rehan Allah Wala)
>   4. Re: UK and Australia  unlimited calling channels needed
>      (Mitul Limbani)
>   5. Re: [asterisk-users] H.264 *Not Patented* (Matthew Rubenstein)
>   6. Re: Re: [asterisk-users] H.264 *Not Patented*
>      (Trixter aka Bret McDanel)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 04:04:04 +0000
> From: Mike Benoit <ipso at snappymail.ca>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] OT:Any guy from Teliax here?
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> <asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com>
> Message-ID: <1169870644.7267.374.camel at ipso.snappymail.ca>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Interesting, I've been with Teliax for over 2years now and the one thing
> I have always been able to depend on is that my emails have always been
> answered and my phone calls have also always been answered with almost 0
> on-hold time.
>
> They have been great for me and I would recommend them to anyone. No
> doubt they have had growing pains in the past, about 2 months ago they
> stopped accepting Canadian credit cards for a few weeks, so I had to use
> paypal, but they were upfront about the issue and did fix it eventually.
>
> Excellent company to do business with.
>
> n Fri, 2007-01-26 at 00:44 +0700, Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I tested Teliax service for sometime. This service has good comments
>> on this forum. The quality is OK, but all phone calls and emails are
>> not answered. We are provider seeking quality routes. If any guy from
>> Teliax out there, please contact
>> phong(dot)nguyen(at)vienthongso(dot)com.
>> Thanks
>> -- 
>> With best regards,
>> Nguyen
>> _______________________________________________
>> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>>
>> asterisk-biz mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
> -- 
> Mike Benoit <ipso at snappymail.ca>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url : 
> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20070126/cc712781/attachment-0001.pgp
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:09:55 +0530
> From: "adi" <adi at weblk.com>
> Subject: [asterisk-biz] UK and Australia  unlimited calling channels
> needed
> To: <asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com>
> Message-ID: <001601c741e6$586cb030$7f00000a at cfndesktop>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi
> We need UK fixed line termination. we do not want to pay by the min, we 
> will pay a fixed amount per month per line.
>
> We need 10 lines to start. I am interested in a solutions like this for 
> Australia land lines as well.
>
> Regards
> Adi
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20070127/5a652bbe/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 23:47:22 -0800
> From: "Rehan Allah Wala" <rehan at supertec.com>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] UK and Australia unlimited calling
> channels needed
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> <asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com>
> Message-ID: <45BA930A.13459.2289AD1 at rehan.supertec.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> broadvoice.com
>
>
>>
>> Hi
>> We need UKfixed line termination. we do not want to pay by the min, we 
>> will pay a fixed amount
>> per month per line.
>>
>> We need 10 lines to start. I am interested in a solutions like this for 
>> Australia land lines as well.
>>
>> Regards
>> Adi
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Super Technologies Inc., Pensacola, Florida
> http://www.SuperTec.com - Technologies from tomorrow, Today!
>
> MSN: Rehan at Rehan.com
> Skype: Rehan33
>
> "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then 
> you
> win." By Mahatma Gandhi.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20070127/af18eeba/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 13:52:49 +0530
> From: Mitul Limbani <mitul at enterux.com>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] UK and Australia  unlimited calling
> channels needed
> To: asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com
> Message-ID: <20070127135249.w4a3fr7kcg484w4o at mail.enterux.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed"
>
> Adi,
>
> Well its gonna be same, 1 E1 with 30 lines shall be able to populate a
> volume of roughly close to 1.5M - 2.0M minutes/month, so if you are
> ready to pay all that amount upfront, thats all the more better :) we
> can provide you with a fixed costs with a upper ceiling of 2M
> mins/month, let me know if thats fine, we can then provide you with a
> FIXED Cost per month in prepaid mode. Contact me off the list.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Mitul Limbani,
> Founder & CEO,
> Enterux Solutions,
> The Enterprise Linux Company (TM),
> www.enterux.com
>
> Quoting adi <adi at weblk.com>:
>
>> Hi
>> We need UK fixed line termination. we do not want to pay by the min,
>> we will pay a fixed amount per month per line.
>>
>> We need 10 lines to start. I am interested in a solutions like this
>> for Australia land lines as well.
>>
>> Regards
>> Adi
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:15:04 -0500
> From: Matthew Rubenstein <email at mattruby.com>
> Subject: [asterisk-biz] Re: [asterisk-users] H.264 *Not Patented*
> To: Lee Jenkins <lee at datatrakpos.com>
> Cc: Asterisk-Biz <asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com>
> Message-ID: <1169918105.8987.151.camel at localhost.localdomain>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 11:33 -0500, Lee Jenkins wrote:
>> Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
>> > The H.264 codec patent by Qualcomm has been ruled invalid by a San
>> > Diego Federal jury:
>> > http://www.eetimes.com/news/semi/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=197001066 
>> > .
>> > That means that H.264 codecs can now be written, distributed and 
>> > revised
>> > freely under any license their authors choose, including GPL, public
>> > domain, or any other, and $free now that royalties are no longer
>> > required.
>> >
>> > How does H.264 compare with GSM and G.729 in CPU demand (MIPS:Kbps) and
>> > audio quality at low bitrates? GSM is $free, but G.729 is higher 
>> > quality
>> > (tho patented with at least $10 per running codec instance royalties).
>> > Will H.264 become the favorite high-quality Asterisk codec, or will it
>> > perhaps force G.729 to become free, or negligibly cheaper?
>>
>> Although I wouldn't complain about a free G.729 codec, I have to be
>> honest in saying that $10.00 isn't that great of an expense considering
>> the better call quality you get.
>
> It's a question of scale. If I've got a Pentium that can handle 400
> unencoded legs max, by the time I get through with multiparty
> conferences, streaming and maybe recording unencoded, I might have only
> 50-75 simul calls, which is about $650 in codec licenses on a $650 PC.
> That's cheap in terms of value, but expensive in terms of cost.
> Especially if  I want to run thousands of simul calls, which doubles my
> 5-figure cost to 6-figures. While I'd rather spend the money on
> operations staff and developers who can add features and reliability.
> -- 
>
> (C) Matthew Rubenstein
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:50:45 +0000
> From: "Trixter aka Bret McDanel" <trixter at 0xdecafbad.com>
> Subject: Re: [asterisk-biz] Re: [asterisk-users] H.264 *Not Patented*
> To: email at mattruby.com, "Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk
> Discussion" <asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com>
> Message-ID:
> <a4d011c50701271050u12366908ja926a5a1b8ab953e at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>> On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 11:33 -0500, Lee Jenkins wrote:
>>
>> > >
>> > >     How does H.264 compare with GSM and G.729 in CPU demand
>> (MIPS:Kbps) and
>> > > audio quality at low bitrates? GSM is $free, but G.729 is higher
>> quality
>>
>> I just caught this but oh well.  GSM as used in asterisk has patent 
>> claims
> by philips.  It expires this June or July I forget, Philips seems to have
> stopped trying to enforce their patent claims on the very library asterisk
> uses, but right now technically using it without a license could get you
> sued (only part of the gsm codec is claimed to be patented).
>
> The newer GSM 6.10 which afaik asterisk does not support although there
> might be 3rd party people doing it has additional patents on the AMR parts
> of it.  Those dont expire so quickly.
>
> -- 
> Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com     Bret McDanel
> Belfast +44 28 9099 6461        US +1 516 687 5200
> http://www.trxtel.com the VoIP provider that pays you!
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20070127/d1239651/attachment-0001.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-biz mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>
>
> End of asterisk-biz Digest, Vol 30, Issue 61
> ********************************************
>