[asterisk-biz] Obtaining DIDs

[Shidan]

out of curiosity, is DIDx or anyone involved paying you to support them.

----
Shidan Gouran

On 2/8/06, trixter aka Bret McDanel <trixter at 0xdecafbad.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 01:10 -0600, Mark wrote:
> > I doubt that! See how you "own" the DID when a shifty seller drops out
> > of DIDx! DIDx does not protect the buyer when a seller leaves the DIDx
> > syste.
> >
> they claim they do in their faq, where if it doesnt work for the month
> due to that you get a refund or something.  I recall a post from linda I
> think on that not that long ago.
>
> Most carriers can change your did at will, broadvoice for example
> changed someones tollfree for no aparent reason, information of that was
> posted to this list about the same time as the comments on their faq,
> maybe a month ago.
>
>
>
> > attempting to use scare tactics against me for excercising my rights of
> > free speech based solely on the facts of my experience with their
>
> you should reread the constitution, you dont have an absolute right to
> speech in america, private entities can curtail that freely, think of a
> movie theater where you can be removed if you talk during the movie.
> Then there are other limitations, such as you cant yell 'fire' in a
> crowded theater, etc.
>
> The first amendment is a limitation on the government not a priviledge
> granted to you, its a symantic difference but one that need to be
> understood if you want to understand the meaning and intent of the
> amendment.
>
> And lastly something that most people dont seem to understand is that a
> right to speech doesnt guarantee a right to be heard.
>
>
> > organization. This "notice" was served via email which I do not believe
> > is a valid form for serving a legal notice in any US State, although I
> > am not an attorney, so I may be wrong.
> >
> It is providing it is delivered to the correct person.  You can
> obviously try to challenge it as 'defective service' but by doing that
> you admit that you infact got it.  But its too late to try to say that
> you didnt get it now, your post that you were infact served is now
> archived all over the net :)  assuming it was actually service and not
> just a more informal notice.
>
> To prove this is accepted by the courts, well sorta (I dont recall the
> exact cite, but google does have it indexed somewhere) a lawyer
> challenged notice in court saying the email was lost (he didnt appear in
> the first place) - he wasnt saying it wasnt sent, because he cant prove
> that, only saying that he never received it - something no one else can
> prove under normal circumstances.  This was last summer iirc.
>
>
> --
> Trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com     Bret McDanel
> UK +44 870 340 4605   Germany +49 801 777 555 3402
> US +1 360 207 0479 or +1 516 687 5200
> FreeWorldDialup: 635378
> http://www.sacaug.org/ Sacramento Asterisk Users Group
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQBD6aAh+1olxlzQw5cRAtPKAJ93IaW7D7yP6r+wavMuqV8WHR+2LwCfWQZ7
> +rhplbb18zaCQLEPNFReXv4=
> =nmFf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-biz mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>
>
>