[asterisk-biz] Rant: Wannabe "carriers" please tell the truth orlive up to expectations.

[Script Head]

I am in a process of doing exactly that. In fact, last weeks experiences
have driven me to talk directy to Tier-1 carriers.

The sad part is, even at the point where I was pushing less than 1/2 million
minutes per month, many carriers couldn't handle the traffic. It was always
something: lack of avaiable bandwith, crashing servers or codecs,
downtime... It seem that the majority of "carriers" aren't even prepared to
handle traffic like that.



On 2/1/06, Alex Pui <alex.pui at act-labs.com> wrote:
>
>  Script Head,
>
>
>
> I am not a "carrier", but I think the question would be, if you are buying
> more volume than most of the "carrier" here, why would you deal with them?
> Just trying to insult them that they are not "quality"provider. I think you
> should deal with tier 1 carrier by yourself.
>
>
>
> Or do I miss anything?
>
>
>
> Alex
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:
> asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com] *On Behalf Of *Script Head
> *Sent:* February 1, 2006 10:30 AM
> *To:* Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> *Subject:* [asterisk-biz] Rant: Wannabe "carriers" please tell the truth
> orlive up to expectations.
>
>
>
> If you're in the business of providing termination services (some at
> incredibly low prices), please read this.
>
> I have dealt with many so called carriers over the last couple of months,
> almost all of them are present on this list. I am always clear about my
> calling patterns and expected volume.  Everyone wants the minutes and always
> say "oh we can take all you can send" and always lie about or underestimate
> your capacity. When I send 50 or more channels, you choke. Some have choked
> at 20 channels, some even less. You might have enough channels committed
> form your "upstream provider" but you don't have enough bandwidth to accept
> the calls and send them to your upstream. I am almost sure that the majority
> didn't do any scalability testing.
>
> The points are:
>
> 1. If you're a reseller of a reseller with a 10+ domestic "carriers"
> loaded in your LCR, you are not a quality provider.
> 2. If you do have Tier-1 upstreams, you shouldn't have a problem revealing
> that information. If you have a problem doing that, you're using
> bottom-of-the-barrel carriers.
> 3. If your entire infrastructure consits on a leased box on Cogent
> bandwith "burstable to 100 mbit", you're not a qualitity provider. Nobody in
> their right mind will let you burst from 1 mbit to 100 for $59.95 per month.
>
> 4. When someone asks you for a commitment of N number of channels, you
> better damn have them or say straight out you can't do it.
>
> I think it should be also a normal practice to make iptraf avaiable to a
> potential customer so he can test the amount of bandwidth (and burst) you
> have available.
>
> ScriptHead
>
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-biz mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20060201/9aeceea4/attachment.htm