[asterisk-biz] Asterisk Tools

[Andrew Latham]

Andrew

Exactly my concern.  A telco can break services by attempting to
comply with other rules or there lack of.  With the over regulated
systems that we have in the US (only over regulated because of
extensive wireline laid verses cellular towers like in Somalia) what
type of service interuptions can happen do to locked CPE equipment,
Smarter Smartjacks, Last mile switching interfaces to new "secure
auditable tapable switches" and how do we respond to customers or our
own downtime when our service is down.


Andrew

On 8/30/06, Andrew Kohlsmith <akohlsmith-asterisk at benshaw.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2006 13:13, Andrew Latham wrote:
> > I am afraid of why you want to do this, I am also afraid of what the
> > FCC will do to curb this in the future by altering switching on copper
> > and fiber connections.
>
> I spoof my Caller*ID all the time, and it's for legitimate purposes.  Some
> telcos allow you to set *any* Caller*ID, others only allow you to set it to a
> DID that they deliver to you over your PRI, and others always force the
> outgoing Caller*ID to your BTN.  There isn't any great fear here.
>
> > unreliable the system currently is.  Will circuit ID lookups attach an
> > ANI in the future and how long could this tie up new and upgrade
> > installations...
>
> I'm not sure, but at least on Bell Canada PRIs, it is not possible to receive
> accurate ANI on anything other than incoming tollfree calls.  Mobile carriers
> especially send odd ANI for numbers terminating to regular DIDs.
>
> -A.
> _______________________________________________
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-biz mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>


-- 
---
Andrew Latham - AKA: LATHAMA (lay-th-ham-eh)
lathama at lathama.com - lathama at gmail.com
If any of the above are down we have bigger problems than my email!
Hind sight is most always 20/20 or better.
---