[Asterisk-biz] Re: Best stable asterisk release for SOHO for 35 users

Saul Diaz saul at cripiland.com
Tue Nov 1 09:18:27 MST 2005


Paul wrote:

Hi  i work directly from asterisk usually.

and install my own manager solution ..

regards

>On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
>
>  
>
>>As long as you need to do things the way that A at H has decided is the 
>>"correct" way to do things. If you need to step outside of the basic 
>>parameters for which it was originally intended and do any minute amount 
>>of customization, the chore becomes ominous. The name of the product is 
>>"Asterisk At Home" not, "Asterisk At A Small Business".
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>Just as Digium about the nightmares they have in their support desk 
>>because of A at H.
>>    
>>
>
>You can really make the best of all worlds if you use A at H as a quick load
>(A at H) then adjust.
>
>I use the 1.5 A at H load, yum update, then pull CVS for zaptel, libpri,
>asterisk & asterisk-addons. 
>
>After modifications such as WebMin, TFTP, and the like I pick up the new AMP
> 
>AMP 1.10.009 writes over the header file in apache and adds the new voice
>mail interface. Sugar and A at H interfaces are hidden but available, but you
>can always delete the web folders.
>
>I add the interface to the cisco xml to allow for the interface to the
>contact portion of sugar, but do the contacts DB upload without sugar.  I
>add an XML interface to the cisco phones so the extensions in AMP are
>available as a directory at the phone.  I add a paging for all / one / or
>groups of extensions.
>
>You do not deal with A at H limitations, but rather the AMP system.  I do not
>find AMP limiting, and if you look at the configuration files there is a way
>to override every customization installed by AMP. 
>
>So when I need to dial another server without using a prefix I can customize
>the extensions.conf by using the custom file (which takes precedence) rather
>that the rewritten AMP extensions file.
>
>You should take another look at the time saver.  Since that is what it
>really is.
>
>Regards,
>Paul Norris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Biz mailing list
>Asterisk-Biz at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>  
>




More information about the asterisk-biz mailing list