[Asterisk-biz] Forklift a 2000 phone PBX - 5000 calls up

[Cirelle Internet Products]

steve wrote:

>Hi:
>
>You are correct.   Vonage is using lots of computers and gateways.  They do
>not have all their eggs in one basket.   They are using many carriers in
>different areas. 
>
>I know that in Mexico, Vonage is starting to have major problems.   Telmex
>is blocking their audio channel and the Southwest bell programmers (SWB
>ownes 10% of Telmex) is blocking SIP.
>
>See:  
>
>http://www.broadbandreports.com/shownews/61635
>
>http://www.vonage-forum.com/ftopic4133.html
>
>Steve
>
> 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com
>[mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Yair Hakak
>Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 11:27 AM
>To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] Forklift a 2000 phone PBX - 5000 calls up
>
>I get the feeling that the vast majority of vonage calls are
>vonage->PSTN (which requires the SIP proxy to hand off to a gateway),
>not vonage<->vonage. Couple that with the fact that a large portion of
>vonage users are behind NATs (and STUN isn't exactly 100%) , and i
>start thinking that there is some vonage component (SER, asterisk,
>jasomi, whatever) in the media path in the majority of cases.
>
>In case of vonage<->vonage you're absoutely right (except for NAT).
>
>does this sound logical?
>
>-yair
>
>
>On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:09:18 -0800, steve <steve at 17q.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi:
>>
>>That is somewhat true but it is not the same as SER.  Example:   With SER
>>there is no codex translation.  Vonage is using SER with over 500,000
>>    
>>
>users.
>  
>
>>Steve
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com
>>[mailto:asterisk-biz-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of steve szmidt
>>Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:34 AM
>>To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
>>Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] Forklift a 2000 phone PBX - 5000 calls up
>>
>>On Monday 28 March 2005 12:12, alex at pilosoft.com wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>On Mon, 28 Mar 2005, Dan Iordanescu wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>If you define the sip users in sip.conf with: canreinvite=yes then *
>>>>behaves like SER; it's not in the middle anymore. Asterisk-users list
>>>>has a lot more on this stuff.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Stick to selling epygi, Dan, that doesn't require thinking.
>>>      
>>>
>>That's uncalled for Alex.
>>
>>If someone does not understand then try to educate or at least offer
>>constructive critisism.
>>
>>--
>>
>>Steve Szmidt
>>
>>"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety
>>deserve neither liberty nor safety."
>>                               Benjamin Franklin
>>_______________________________________________
>>Asterisk-Biz mailing list
>>Asterisk-Biz at lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Asterisk-Biz mailing list
>>Asterisk-Biz at lists.digium.com
>>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>>
>>    
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Biz mailing list
>Asterisk-Biz at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>
>_______________________________________________
>Asterisk-Biz mailing list
>Asterisk-Biz at lists.digium.com
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
>
>
>  
>
http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3487466