[Asterisk-biz] voip termination deployment models

Tim Schroeder tim at ukvoice.co.uk
Wed Apr 27 13:56:59 MST 2005


>
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Juan Lestoni wrote:
>
> > Regarding SER vs. Asterisk as SIP server, when it comes to manage NAT
> > with SER + rtpproxy, is SER still in an order of magnitude above
> > Asterisk, or have both the same performance in number of concurrent
> > calls ?
> Yes.
>
> Also, keep in mind, its not the number of concurrent calls, its calls
> setup/teardowns per second. (Even with rtpproxying)
>
> -alex
>

Hang on... wouldn't RTP proxying be more of a load on the SER than call
setup/teardowns?
After all, with proxying the server is receiving AND retransmitting each
active call's media stream, so would that be the limiting factor not call
setup/teardown per second.... ????

Tim




More information about the asterisk-biz mailing list